Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Animal Welfare and Food-Cop Fanatics Run Another Add full of Lies and Deception

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:20 AM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom Oscar Mayer Gets Swift-Boated. Are We Listening?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
Meat August 27, 2008
Oscar Mayer Gets Swift-Boated. Are We Listening?

Oscar Mayer Gets Swift-Boated. Are We Listening?

The animal rights crazies at the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) are at it again, blanketing America with a TV ad re-branding hot dogs as the new cancer stick. But is anyone buying their baloney? The Associated Press noted last night that PCRM's research is lacking; and the children in its ad, who claim to have terminal cancer, don't:

A new TV commercial shows kids eating hot dogs in a school cafeteria and one little boy's haunting lament: "I was dumbfounded when the doctor told me I have late-stage colon cancer" …

But the boy doesn't have cancer. Neither do two other kids in the ad who claim to be afflicted.

The commercial's pro-vegetarian sponsors say it's a dramatization that highlights research linking processed meats, including hot dogs, with higher odds of getting colon cancer.

But that connection is based on studies of adults, not children, and the increased risk is slight, even if you ate a hot dog a day. While compelling, it isn't conclusive.

PCRM, like most agenda-driven activist organizations, is appealing to two groups of people: the general public, and opinion-leading elites who shape our public discussions. On both counts, the anti-meat group appears to be gasping for breath.

Consider how newspaper editors — the people who filter the news for the public — interpreted the AP story during the last 24 hours. Many editors, well, editorialized about the value of what PCRM was cooking up by re-writing the story's headline for their readers. Here's just a sampling:

So much for leading the thought leaders. But what about John Q. Public? Again, the serial exaggerators at PCRM aren't making any friends at a time in our political season when doom-and-gloom messages usually give way to hope and optimism. (Hint: Cancer isn't terribly uplifting.) We looked at the online comments of more than two dozen newspapers and TV stations that reprinted the AP story, and here's what we found:

  • In Chicago: "Someone tell me the difference between what these people are doing and our government officials recalling 9/11 to get people to vote. Scare tactics are pathetic. I'm going to go have a hot dog with my kid now."

It's official: There may yet be hope for this great nation of ours. And here at the Center for Consumer Freedom, we're all having hot dogs for lunch.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
Cartoons

Copyright © 2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home