Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Contrary to what HSUS and Peta etc. Tell You, Abraham Lincoln Was Not An Animal Rights Activist

Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:50 PM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom Abraham Lincoln Was Not An Animal Rights Activist


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Animal Rights October 29, 2008
 
 
Abraham Lincoln Was Not An Animal Rights Activist

Abraham Lincoln Was Not An Animal Rights Activist

Animal rights nuts live in a world where the line between fact and fiction is blurry at best. On Planet PETA, for instance, circus elephants aren't a source of family entertainment, or a fantastic mechanism to prevent the extinction of a vulnerable species. Nooo. Circus elephants are "slaves." And don't get us started about egg-laying chickens. The Humane Society of the United States believes keeping them in cages, where the odd sick bird can't infect a few thousand others, is a form of "cruelty." (Actual experts at the American Veterinary Medical Association disagree.)

So we're used to animal rights groups distorting reality in the pursuit of legal "rights" for four-legged creatures. But when they exploit the ghosts of worthy human historical figures and put PETA-approved words in their mouths, they've crossed a different sort of line.

We've already debunked the animal rights movement's widespread use of an apocryphal quote misattributed to Leonardo Da Vinci -- it's a lie literally chiseled in stone at the office of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. We've also established that animal liberationists have twisted the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in order to create the illusion of sympathy for violent radicalism.

Now add Abraham Lincoln to the growing list of famous figures hijacked by the animal rights movement.

Beginning with the 1985 publication of The Extended Circle: A Dictionary of Humane Thought (below, the same book that first flubbed the Da Vinci quote), animal activists have been using and abusing this supposed utterance of Honest Abe -- proudly plastering it on shirts and coffee mugs, and citing it in letters to newspaper editors:

from page 179, "The Extended Circle: A Dictionary of Humane Thought"

It would make a compelling story if the Great Emancipator had actually advocated extending his landmark freedom ethos to other species. But he never did. This week we called the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum to see if their research staff could authenticate the "quote." Searching Lincoln's near-comprehensive Collected Works, they found exactly zero mentions of "animal rights."

We're not the only ones who suspected post-mortem ventriloquism. The eminent Lincoln scholars Don and Virginia Fehrenbacher have written about it in their Recollected Words of Abraham Lincoln. They cite this quote as one of the "undocumented quotations ... attaching themselves to Lincoln and gaining currency through repetition." But they found "no credible evidence" that he ever uttered or wrote these words.

We understand why PETA, the Humane Society of the United States, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, and all of their followers are a bit self-delusional about Honest Abe (who, by the way, ate meat) being with them under the tofu tent. Who wouldn't want him on their team? But since Leonardo Dr. King, and Abe Lincoln are officially "normal" again, we're going to have a hard time from now on believing any famous historical figures were ever vegetarians. It's about time someone did some due-diligence on Thomas Edison, Henry David Thoreau, Mark Twain, and Mahatma Gandhi. And we're just the research team to do it.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  ObesityMyths.com

Copyright © 2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Monday, October 27, 2008

The Fish Is Fine (But The Mug May Kill You)

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom The Fish Is Fine (But The Mug May Kill You)


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Seafood October 27, 2008
 
 
The Fish Is Fine (But The Mug May Kill You)

The Fish Is Fine (But The Mug May Kill You)

If you're looking for a little shock and terror to go with your sushi this Halloween, seafood activists have got you covered. Many bizarre hours have been spent in a desperate pursuit of the best way to serve up a little mercury hype with your favorite fish: wallet-sized hype, a hype calculator, hype via text message, hype at the fish counter, even hype from a "sea kitten." But the ideal medium, of course, is none of the above. We seafood fans like our mercury scares with a hot beverage. Out of a toxic coffee mug.

As yesterday's "Internal Affairs" columnist at the San Jose Mercury News explained, activists at the Monterey Bay Aquarium really outdid themselves with their latest sushi "education" campaign: 

There was a pocket guide telling sushi lovers which fish are the most ecologically friendly, along with sleek biodegradable chopsticks made from some kind of wheat substance... But things started to seem , er, fishy when [Internal Affairs] got to the coffee mug that came with the package.

While it sported cartoon ocean critters on the side, the bottom also bore a sticker warning that the decorations "contain lead, lead compounds and/or cadmium, which are chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer or birth defects."

Groundless fearmongering about perfectly safe, healthy fish – on a lead-laden mug! And that's not all. When confronted about the hazardous item in his press kit, aquarium spokesman Ken Peterson replied:

"We're not concerned about the health of anyone using the mug or we wouldn't have bought it. If you eat some of the fish off our 'red list,' you are more likely to have problems from things like PCBs and mercury."

But just how "more likely" are you to incur any health problems from fish than a coffee mug decorated with lead particles? Mercury-in-fish activists should know the answer better than anyone. Several years ago, sushi scaremongers tried to use Proposition 65, the very same law requiring labels on coffee mugs and other everyday items, to hit canned tuna with a skull-and-crossbones label. And their anti-tuna suit failed in court. On Every. Single. Ridiculous. Legal. Count.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  Cartoons

Copyright © 2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Obama Supports Peta

And no doubt he's really playing the race card as well.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:37 PM
Subject: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new Obama Peta

This was written by a member of a crested group I belong to
hugs Donna

As I really am a card carrying democrat I can't get far enough away from they're message. In my mind it is so clear cut, no waveringObama took money from PETA and PETA has a legal defense fund forELF (Earth Liberation Front)There again it is a straight line and all of this money is documented. PETA is publicly supporting (remember they are a non profit) Obama and Obama has come out supporting PETA's animal rights campaign (complete and totalanimal liberation)
He sat in a pew for twenty years supporting Reverend Wrights skewed view and only when the public at large learned of those views did he turn away from a church that he has given his money and time toadopt a main stream belief.
Here is one that had me screaming, really, pissed off screaming.CNN had interviewed a old black women sitting on her front porch.She had NEVER voted in her 80 some odd years and she was going to vote for a black president. This is the only issue in 80 years thatyou would get your ass off the porch for???? As a Mother and moreimportant a women I'm horrified at this this !
The one very good thing is that the money has a paper trail andhis supporters are so narcissistic that they want you to know they'renames. One other thought of mine that digs at me is why in the helldoes Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Pitt, and Clooney put millions of dollarsinto foreign countries while children and families in the the U.S.Are suffering. Teachers in need spend they're own money and put aneeds list on www.DonorsChoose.org  
It has gotten so ridiculous !Look what PETA did in Colorado. Money carries influence.It scares me to think who has Obama's ear !! 































































**************
Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics – check it out! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir= http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001) __._,_.___

Mandatory spay and neuter means pets must grow old and die without replacements. No more babies, no more pets in our homes.  Stop it before it's nationwide. Sterile animals cannot replenish themselves. It's the "facts" of life.



Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Friday, October 24, 2008

ROTF! ConsumerFreedom EXCLUSIVE (Parody): Ingrid Newkirk’s First "15 Questions"

Laughably put, but scarily spot on as well.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:19 PM
Subject: ConsumerFreedom EXCLUSIVE (Parody): Ingrid Newkirk's First "15 Questions"


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Animal Rights October 24, 2008
 
 
EXCLUSIVE (Parody): Ingrid Newkirk's First "15 Questions"

EXCLUSIVE (Parody): Ingrid Newkirk's First

Next week TIME magazine will feature People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) founder Ingrid Newkirk in a "10 questions" feature, answering queries cherry-picked from among hundreds suggested online by readers. Today we're hearing a rumor—unconfirmed so far—that the published article was actually made up of questions #16 through #25, hastily uploaded to TIME's website after PETA's lawyers decided Newkirk had answered the first batch of 15 questions a little too frankly. (Judging from the questions, some of them may have been submitted by our faithful readers.)

The questions are real. The answers are the best form of parody, the kind based on a nugget of truth. So here, without further ado, is Ingrid Newkirk—honestly answering 15 questions from TIME readers.


Luca asks: You have stated in the past that you wish your body to be turned into nuggets and eaten after your death. Is there a particular reason for this? Will there be a signup list? 

Ingrid answers: I don't care as long as the dipping sauce is vegan. And there is already a signup list. I think the Center for Consumer Freedom snagged the first spot. 

Sarah asks: Why is it that although PETA is the largest champion for animal rights in the world, you are quick to advocate euthanizing stray animals? Do homeless pets have fewer rights than pigs and chickens?

Ingrid answers: I can neither confirm nor deny allegations that PETA receives the bulk of its funding from a cabal of power-hungry livestock. But I will say that George Orwell was on to something with his observation that "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." And besides, we never expected anyone to find out about our massive animal killing campaign.

Linus asks: When "South Park" laughed at your organisation in that 2004 "Douche and Turd" episode, was that at all funny to you? 

Ingrid answers: I find that sort of nonsense offensive. What sort of monsters would make fun of perfectly normal ostrich-human carnal relations? (Click here and forward to time index 14:14)

Bill asks: Human beings are omnivores; we are meant to eat meat … How do you justify imposing your will on me? 

Ingrid answers: Bill, Bill, Bill … I know what's best for you. And your children. And their children. Can't you just be grateful instead of resisting progress? Or at least write us a check.

Darren asks: Do you ever feel that some of PETA's more extremist actions have hurt your cause rather than aiding it by alienating a potentially receptive public? 

Ingrid answers: I get this question a lot, but I think you're just looking at it wrong. If some people can't appreciate the hilarity of comparing the Nazi Holocaust to a chicken farm, I don't think we need their help. What kind of sick human would value his own family more than a chicken, anyway?

Steven asks: I understand that the #2 person in PETA is diabetic and takes animal-based drugs to treat it. How do you justify that given PETA's stance on animal based drugs? 

Ingrid answers: You're talking about Mary Beth Sweetland, an insulin diabetic who used to lead our programs aimed at shutting down all animal-based medical research, including work to cure AIDS and cancer. Thankfully, she works for another animal rights group now. So her rank hypocrisy is their problem, not ours.

Delmar asks: Animals kill each other in the wild. It's how nature works. As the most evolved of all the animals, why shouldn't we exercise the same privilege? 

Ingrid answers: How dare you suggest that humans are the most evolved animals! What basis could you possibly have for that sort of speciesist bigotry? Besides, everyone knows that bunny rabbits are far ahead of us technologically. 

Kim asks: If, as you say, our pets deserve equal rights, don't they have the right to refuse to have their reproductive organs removed? 

Ingrid answers: Heck no. And why are you assuming I'm against people having their reproductive organs forcibly removed either? We're over-populating the planet as it is. Let's sterilize everyone equally and let Mother Earth sort it out. (You go first.) 

Howard asks: Is it really true that you once protested about Palestinians using donkeys to blow up Israeli school children, but that you were only complaining about the donkeys that were being harmed and not the innocent school children? 

Ingrid answers: Actually, I also pleaded in private with His Excellency, Chairman Arafat, to spare as many camels as possible.

Thomas asks: As a proud vegetarian for twenty years I wonder if some of PETA's more extreme views and stunts have made animal activism seem less reasonable. Can you help me understand what your goals are? 

Ingrid answers: I'm glad you asked. Our primary goal is to make other radical animal rights groups (like the Humane Society of the United States) seem "reasonable" by comparison. Study up on the Irish Republican Army and Sinn Fein. You'll see what I mean. 

Brad asks: Isn't mass arson to university [animal research] labs far more of a travesty than eating a chicken? 

Ingrid answers: Heck no. The animal rights movement has been warning research scientists for decades that we're coming after them, their families, and their universities. They've had plenty of warnings. On the other hand, the chicken never sees the axe coming, poor thing. 

Benjamin asks: If I gave you some soy "chicken" and you ate it, and then later I told you it was real chicken, would you be all like "ew!"? What if the chicken was an orphan? Wouldn't you feel even worse? Well guess what, Ingrid? I work at your favorite restaurant and I did that. You ate dead orphan chicken. You're an awful person.  p.s.: In my imagination you're my girlfriend.   

Ingrid answers: I tried that exact stunt once with Ted Nugent, but in reverse. When I put a carrot in his hot-dog bun instead of that horrible bratwurst, he just smiled and said it would make good bait for his rabbit traps. p.s.: In my imagination Ted's my boyfriend. 

Bob asks: Why are you no different than any other person, a la Terrell Owens, or Kim Jong Il, who make fantastic and ludicrous statements to garner the media's attention? 

Ingrid answers: I am far more ambitious than those amateurs. 

Steve asks: How much of the 30 million donated [to PETA] goes in your pocket?

Ingrid answers: I wear skirts. 

Robert asks: Are you certified insane?

Ingrid answers: Define "certified."

 


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  Cartoons

Copyright © 2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/ConsumerFreedom
Unsubscription: ConsumerFreedom-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Disclaimer: Though we are against genuine cruelty, including cruelty to humans, the position of this list does not endorse any sponsored animal rights/welfare advertising which may appear on the group page.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---