Facebook VS. Lamebook

Much as I now think FB is LB because it allows in a bunch of junk yet disabled my account for no reason, FB apparently can't get enough money and is suing www.lamebook.com for trademark infringement of all things. What? Just because it has 'book' at the end of it's domain - huh? What? So FB and only FB is allowed to 'book' a name and no one else is allowed to use 'book' as part of the end of their site name?

PULEEEEEEZE!

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-20021906-36.html

I liked the idea of Lamebook in that it pokes fun of Facebook chain letters, but the people who crawl and slither around on that site use foul low-class language that's typical of the sort of vulgarity thriving on FB.

So why bother ridiculing chain letters if you're gonna engage in something just as stupid? (that would be liberal use of the f-bomb and other cussing a blue streek.)

Yes, Lamebook is truly lame in this respect.

But I have no respect for sue-wars, people and companies threatening to or actually suing over all kinds of small stupid stuff.

Posted via email from capri