Tuesday, June 30, 2009

'Humane Wayne' Muddies the Airwaves

Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 4:17 PM
Subject: ‘Humane Wayne’ Muddies the Airwaves


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Animal Rights June 30, 2009
 
 
‘Humane Wayne’ Muddies the Airwaves

‘Humane Wayne’ Muddies the Airwaves

“I don’t think anyone can reasonably claim that our work is moving in the direction of eliminating animal agriculture,” Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) president Wayne Pacelle insisted this morning during an interview with the farm-belt AgriTalk radio program. Sure. While we’re at it, we’re happy to let you know that the government won’t raise your taxes. That stain on your tie? It’ll come out. And veggie burgers taste just like chicken.

“Humane Wayne,” as he is known on Capitol Hill, provided a masterful, if typical, on-air defense of America’s richest animal rights group, refusing to concede that… well, that it is an animal rights group.

  • Are you trying to get people to stop eating meat? “We have to drop the paranoia … We do think there are issues with the current state of production and the per capita consumption of animal products.”
  • Is promoting veganism a big part of your agenda? “The most I ever talk about veganism is when I’m talking to the ag community, or the hunting lobby, or someone who’s trying to poke a hole in our work… We support Certified Humane programs.”
  • Can I find meat in the HSUS cafeteria? “We don’t have a cafeteria. People bring their own lunch or they go out.”

Not surprisingly, much of the discussion centered on Ohio, a state where HSUS has threatened to sponsor a 2010 ballot initiative (similar to its California “Proposition 2” effort in 2008) that would outlaw several common livestock handling practices.

  • Do you have plans now for Ohio, or for a ballot initiative in any other state in the near future? “We’re committed to stopping the intensive confinement of animals: veal crates and gestation crates and battery cages. And we’ll continue to work on that on all fronts. And Ohio is still very much at top of mind for us, despite this effort.”

The Ohio “effort” that Pacelle refers to is a legislative maneuver that will ask voters to decide this year whether to create a new Livestock Care Standards Board. That idea is supported by both houses of Ohio’s legislature and the state’s Governor. It would let farmers guarantee the humane handling of their animals. Not HSUS.

Humane Wayne is having none of it. “We’re very much willing to compromise,” he insists.

To a point.

Complaining about his carpetbaggers being pre-empted by Ohioans, Pacelle sniped: “We could have sat down and, you know, negotiated that. We could have had some more terms and some more balance.”

“We prefer not to resort to initiatives. They’re costly, they’re divisive, and we always prefer another route … Obviously you know about Prop 2, and it would be in our interest to achieve the same set of reforms that California voters and Arizona voters approved, but we’re willing to talk to you before we go down that road.”

Here Pacelle touches on what’s in “our interest.” Was this a slip of the tongue? We thought he was looking out for the animals’ best interests. Silly us.

A few moments of candor were bound to slip out over the course of an hour. Here are two worth noting.

  • But it has to go to the voters and they have to approve it. Isn’t that the same thing you did in California? “Well, that’s true. But again, it’s designed to prevent this initiative from taking effect. It’s clearly a blocking maneuver.”
  •  Do you spend money on animal welfare research … on what is the best way to care for animals? “Yes, but we work on all issues related to human-animal relationships, whether it’s companion animals or horses or animals used in laboratories, or animals in agriculture or other settings. We’re not a research-oriented organization. We don’t fund research. We don’t fund every local humane society.”

True again. As we’ve been saying, HSUS funds comparatively very few of them. According to its own 2007 tax filings, the group contributed just 3.64 percent of its budget to organizations that operate hands-on dog and cat shelters.

  • A lot of people want to know why isn’t more of that money used on actual shelters, and adoption of animals. Why isn’t more of your money going to those types of programs? “There are 10 billion animals raised for food in this country, and there are 7-8 million who go into shelters. We put a lot of energy on that, and we are working aggressively to address that problem … I know some of your listeners would love for us to just give all our money to shelters so they can kind of have a free-running field to do whatever they want with animals in agriculture.”
  • What percent of your budget would you say goes to animal shelters? “Well, it depends on how you define animal shelters … If people want us to spend all of our hard dollars on animal shelters, they can support their local society. We think that’s fabulous… But we have other issues we want to work on.”

Before signing off, AgriTalk host Mike Adams dared to jump into one of the most embarrassing episodes in HSUS’s recent history. “If you find a problem,” Adams asked Pacelle, “some animal welfare violation or something going wrong, do you immediately put the word out about that? Or is there a lag time there? … If you know about things that are wrong, why don’t you say that right now?”

Adams was talking about the Hallmark-Westland case, where animal cruelty clearly existed. HSUS sat on its video evidence for months while it continued.

  • Did you go straight to them [the USDA] as soon as you found out? “No, we didn’t. We went to the local prosecutor in San Bernardino County and they wanted to investigate. And they asked us to keep the information quiet while they continued their investigation.”

Pacelle is displaying a lack of familiarity with the truth here. Or maybe his brain has shrunk from his vegan diet, and he’s just forgotten. Either way, the San Bernardino DA’s office remembered it quite differently last year. (We even called for a perjury investigation into the sworn testimony of HSUS’ Dr. Michael Greger.)

Tune in to AgriTalk radio on Wednesday at 11:00am EDT to hear farmers—real farmers—give Pacelle a piece of their minds. And call 1-888-247-4825 during the show to add your own two cents.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  Cartoons

Copyright © 2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.

Posted via email from capri

Another Desktop Buddy

Friday, June 26, 2009

The Way Corrupt Government Panders to Extreme Anti-Pet Agendas

Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new Fw: Re: [PennDogLeg] PA - Dogs from Almost Heaven Kennels healthy enough to adopt, Department of Agriculture says



Julian Prager needs to know that the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture has been supporting false claims against breeders:

http://www.ohmidog.com/tag/linda-brown/

This is probably how the Almost Heaven kennel was denied its license.  It couldn't clear the false complaints against it, thus they lost their shirt.  Once again, their one weapon is the false accusation.  See how far they got with it.  Is Julian Prager a complete idiot or did he just not get the news about Linda Brown?  WE ABSOLUTELY CANNOT LEGITIMIZE ANY COMPLAINTS THAT COME FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE THIS AGENDA AGAINST ANIMAL OWNERSHIP, NOT ONE, NO MATTER WHAT.  I thought that statement was important enough to place in all caps.  They use the few genuine bad incidents against good owners, maliciously.  That is an illegitimate use of a complaint and this toy must be taken away from them.

The attack on Linda Brown proved that the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture is absolutely incapable of dealing with its own corruption.  In such a high profile case the director would have known and would have dealt with the wrongness and apologized, instead he allowed a prosecution.

In the Heavenly Kennels case, in spite of Julian Prager's claim, the care of the animals was an issue.  The alleged poor care was the reason for the denial of a license to keep more animals.  It is an issue now because there are a lot of people out there slandering the owner and pretending, right now, that there was something wrong with the dogs that magically cleared up after 48 hours of care at the local humane societies.  They can't help lying about someone in a case where they won, even.  That sob story is an obscenity.  Bill White deserves to be sued over that and I hope he loses his shirt over it.  That was such a crap propaganda piece that he should be send back to 1933 Germany.

http://www.mcall.com/news/local/all-whitebox.6939491jun25,0,6572033.column

It was a surprise raid, too, and there is an element of retaliation against Chris Ryder for having attempted to enforce his legal rights.  Not even that, actually.  He was legally trying to get licensed after an abrupt and unjust change in the laws.  Is Julian Prager trying to sabotage us?

Breeding is the opposite of killing.  My blog: www.animalculture.org




__._,_.___
Mandatory spay and neuter means pets must grow old and die without replacements. No more babies, no more pets in our homes.  Stop it before it's nationwide. Sterile animals cannot replenish themselves. It's the "facts" of life.
Yahoo! Groups
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email Delivery: Digest">Switch delivery to Daily Digest | dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change Delivery Format: Traditional">Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=">Unsubscribe
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

Posted via email from capri

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Know Thy Self, Know Thy Nanny

Exactly what I've been saying along about these modernday puritan activist groups, they are so afraid that someone somewhere, might be happy!
 
Capri
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:39 PM
Subject: [CE] Know Thy Self, Know Thy Nanny


This email was sent to you by the Center for Consumer Freedom. To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add info@consumerfreedom.com to your address book.

Daily Headlines www.consumerfreedom.com
DonationsCartoonsGamesOp-edsConsumerFreedom.com
Search Search
 
Big Government June 24, 2009
 
 
Know Thy Self, Know Thy Nanny

Know Thy Self, Know Thy Nanny

What motivates the pushy puritans we’ve come to know as the Nanny State? Last week, we shared our thoughts with three other “anti-nannyists” on a KBDI-TV (PBS Denver) roundtable hosted by The Independence Institute. And as panelist Radley Balko pointed out, H.L. Mencken had a good sense of what’s behind the “we know what’s best for you” mentality.

According to Mencken, “the urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.” Fat bans, restaurant ordinances, and liquid “sin” taxes are among the many products of busybody bureaucrats that have proven Mencken right.

But as fellow panelist David Harsanyi of The Denver Post pointed out – and reiterated in his column this week – nutrition zealots are delaying the inevitable. Everyone’s time on Earth is limited, and some of us are perfectly willing to make trade-offs. It’s a decision that should be ours to make.

A few years ago, I heard a highly educated and successful author maintain that a life without cigarettes and copious amounts of alcohol is a life not worth living. There exists no warning label, no bone-chilling study, no crafty public service announcement that is going to separate me from my sour cream- and cheese-infested burrito.

At this point, anyone who doesn't comprehend that french fries aren't a suitable vegetable substitute will not be aided by preventive health care—unless it includes the cost of a cerebral transplant.

Take away all the rhetoric about “externalities” and what might buy us five more years in the nursing home, and what you have left is pure dietary puritanism. And, in Mencken’s words, “the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.”

Or happily enjoying a cheeseburger and fries.

Watch “Independent Thinking” in three segments on YouTube: Part One, Part Two, and Part Three.


Breaking News

Here's a sampling of other stories that have caught our interest today. To see a one-week archive of these items, click here.


Past Headlines
  ObesityMyths.com

Copyright © 2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 34557 | Washington, DC 20043 | Tel: 202-463-7112 | info@consumerfreedom.com
You're receiving this Email because you are subscribed to the Center for Consumer Freedom's daily news list. If you want to change your email preferences, click here. If you want to be removed from our news list, click here. Or you can send a brief response to: info@consumerfreedom.com.

Posted via email from capri

Yaaaaah! Hahahahahahahaha!

Just look at this! Hehehehehehehehehehehe!
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Yahoo! Answers
To: SophieCapri
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: Yahoo! Answers: Your answer has been chosen as the best answer
 
 Hey, Capri, look what you got!
 
Congratulations, you've got a best answer and 10 extra points!
 
Your answer to the following question really hit the spot and has been chosen as the best answer:
 
Virus from Offended on Encyclopedia Dramatica?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090622181306AAOsYRO
 
Go ahead, do your victory dance. Celebrate a little. Brag a little. Then come back and answer a few more questions!
 
Thanks for sharing what you know and making someone's day.
 
The Yahoo! Answers Team

Posted via email from capri

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Cream Scones

Here's another good one!
 
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:36 AM
Subject: Cream Scones

CHOW: Recipe of the day Newsletter

view newsletter online | manage newsletters | unsubscribe | info@chow.com" style="COLOR: #ebebeb; TEXT-DECORATION: none">send us feedback

JUNE 02, 2009

Cream Scones

The perfect accompaniment to afternoon tea.

By Kate Ramos

Cream Scones

Light, caky, and creamy, these scones are begging for jam or Roasted Rhubarb Compote and clotted cream. Try them as an afternoon snack or paired with your morning tea—they’re easy to make and always elegant.

Game plan: We keep a few sticks of butter in the freezer for whenever the urge for perfectly light biscuits or scones sets in.

Special equipment: This set of Ateco round cutters is useful to have in your kitchen. We used the 2-1/2-inch one to make these scones.

This recipe was featured as part of our tea party story.

TIME/SERVINGS
Total Time: 35 mins
Active Time: 15 mins
Makes: 12 scones

INGREDIENTS
1 3/4 cups all-purpose flour, plus more for dusting
2 1/2 teaspoons baking powder
1 tablespoon granulated sugar
1/2 teaspoon baking soda
1/2 teaspoon kosher salt
4 tablespoons unsalted butter (1/2 stick), frozen
3/4 cup plus 1 tablespoon heavy cream
1 large egg

INSTRUCTIONS

  1. Heat oven to 450°F and arrange rack in middle. Combine flour, baking powder, sugar, baking soda, and salt in a large bowl and whisk ingredients to aerate and break up any lumps; set aside.
  2. Grate frozen butter through large holes on a box grater; add to flour mixture and toss until well combined. Whisk together 3/4 cup of the heavy cream and the egg in a small bowl until egg is broken up. Pour into flour mixture, and mix briefly with your hands or a wooden spoon, until dough just comes together, about 2 minutes.
  3. Turn dough out onto a lightly floured surface and, with lightly floured hands, shape into a circle. Use a rolling pin to roll dough to about 1/2-inch thickness. Dip a 2-1/2-inch biscuit cutter in some extra flour, tap off excess, and stamp out as many scones as possible. Reroll and stamp until you have a total of 12.
  4. Place scones at least 1/2-inch apart on a baking sheet lined with parchment paper. Brush tops of scones with remaining 1 tablespoon cream. Bake until they are puffed and tops are golden and flecked with brown, 10 to 12 minutes. (If scones on one side of the pan begin to get too dark, rotate the pan to ensure even cooking.) Remove scones to a wire rack to cool. Serve warm or at room temperature.

See more recipes at: http://www.chow.com



Illustration by Christoph Niemann

See more recipes at:
http://www.chow.com

IN STORIES

Slimy New KFC Menu Item

Kentucky Grilled Chicken and Arby's Roastburger

The Cocktail Staycation

Armchair travel is a lot more fun with a few drinks

Put Away the Darn Camera

How to politely photograph restaurant food

Summer 2009 Gift Guide

All your warm-weather gifting needs met

Summer 2009 Cookbook Gift Guide

Because cookbooks are easy to wrap and fun to give

Sign Up |  Unsubscribe |  Advertising |  Jobs |  About Us |  Contact Us |  CNET Networks, Inc.

©2009 CBS Interactive, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms and Conditions |  Privacy Policy |  Editorial Policy

CBS Interactive Inc.
235 Second Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
U.S.A.

Posted via email from capri