The "Humane" Movement and the Damage it causes

From Thomas Kirby

  Look at who tells us that we must "adopt" or "rescue" animals when they say we should and in the condition that they care to give them to us.

Sometimes knowing too much about these things can make it difficult to produce a focused essay of a length that people want to read. The SPCAs have a history of stealing animals from people in America that spans over a century and a half and they still don't seem to have a reputation for being thieves. All of the humane organizations have been hijacked by the worst kinds of opportunists, sociopaths, and even weirdo religions from Hell. By hijacking the humane agenda, they get good people to desperately struggle to help them achieve their goals. They don't have to tell those good people the truth about their goals.

The fact is that "adopting" and "rescuing" reduces the number of homes for animals of known higher quality. The very people who would have encouraged breeders to breed for good health have whatever the local humane society cares to give them, and are, ironically, more likely to own animals that are deaf, blind, damaged by prepubescent spay/neuter, or have a host of genetic diseases. They are used to warehouse defective, diseased, and injured animals until those animals die of old age instead of to provide places to live for animals that will help carry forward the genetic heritage of their species. They even pay to be used this way.

The humane movement has become a monster that causes a lot of harm. I'm not sure that it ever did all that much good. At the same time that it might have prevented some ill use, it has also prevented a lot of good things. It has sacrificed a lot of good dogs and other animals for the sake of preventing shelter deaths, and those that they have sacrificed belong to citizens who have a right to the use of their property.

Posted via email from capri