The Bullying Bloodthirsty Animal Rights and Media Muck (NAIA)

From: Wakanska

To: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:20 PM

Subject: RE: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new NAIA

Emma Harter went through this exact thing, and yes she did collaps in court. Los Angeles County was trying to get her property (home) to pay for their care, when some rumors had it that half of the dogs died within the first two months, in the deplorable care they got at the county facilities.. This, I would believe, because I know how they "care" for dogs, and this breed is notoriously prone to metabolic collapse (hypoglycemia) under stress and deprivation.   Emma raised chihuahuas and had quite a lot of them. But, she had five acres, and allegedly had a special building for the dogs, as well as her home. All sorts of wild stories were being pandered by the gutter press.. all the usual ones about feces everywhere, and the extraordinary: i.e. hundreds of wild, unsocialized, frenzied chihuahuas, roaming at large in packs, attacking people at will. That was one of the main versions of trash-journalism, and the numbers reported on her dogs were widely varied, but always in the hundreds. Obviously, with so widely varied numbers, all of them were off base and really didn't know.   Gregory Peck's adopted daughter, Kimi (sp?) allegedly got most of the remaining dogs in her "rescue" eventually and would not let them go to anyone, so that SHE then allegedly took the role of "hoarder". Not so coincidentally, perhaps, Japan was on FIRE at that time, with a huge chihuahua craze, and no one could supply the demand, with prices averaging around $3,000 for an adult dog.   You really have to wonder about a society like this one that places so little value on the property and civil liberties of citizens who have worked hard to earn what they have. Emma was a school cafeteria worker for most of her adult life and raised a family.   I cannot say directly that I heard anyone cheer when she collapsed, but up until then, everyone on the AR lists were condemning her and applauding her arrest and prosecution. Typically, dog people are disinterested in the plight of people like this, albeit a bit nervous about their own situation. Rightly so.. almost any of us who has kept any number of dogs has been in situations which the average person just would not understand. There is no "explaining the situation" to a rapacious prosecutor. They just go for the jugular! There are no exceptions made for someone of good intent, or on hard luck, or in failing health and finances. All such people are fair game and easy prey, and will be portrayed in the worst possible light to the media and the jurors.   This is what happens when two HSUS affiliates in political office drafted their "puppy protection law", and when one goes on to become State Attorney General (overseer of the entire criminal justice system), and the other co-sponsor opens his own lobbying office, with HSUS as a top client. I am talking about the Polanco-Lockyer Act, by the way. --- On Thu, 10/16/08, Thomas Kirby <slowswimmer1@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Thomas Kirby <slowswimmer1@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new NAIA To: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 11:38 AM Who cheers when an old lady collapses in court after learning that she is going to lose her house to pay the sociopaths who stole her animals from her?  Anyone who does that is not a human being and should check into a sex offender's unit for the rest of his or her life, because he or she is (obscene metaphor deleted) crazy and likes to (obscene metaphor deleted) people, by force.  Whoever did this to her needs their names on a wall of shame.  Maybe instead of calling them animal rights activists we should use the term "animal rights sociopaths."  Several of these organizations try to officially shed the term "animal rights" and continue with the same policies and actions as animal rights activists, and I keep running into people who want to help them do this.  They are doing it because animal rights has such a well-deserved horrible reputation and they want to slime that reputation off of them.

__._,_.___

Mandatory spay and neuter means pets must grow old and die without replacements. No more babies, no more pets in our homes.  Stop it before it's nationwide. Sterile animals cannot replenish themselves. It's the "facts" of life.

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___