Re: Three Strikes Mustang Ranch
From: Thomas Kirby
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 6:32 PM
Mustang Ranch
| The horse that I pointed out has some darker mud streaks just where shading is needed to look thinner, and they look very much like they were drawn on. I can't tell for sure whether they were put there before or after the picture was taken. The mud in the shading is darker than the mud on the rest of the horse. One thing that tells you that that horse could be handled: most of the mane has been trimmed off. There is no good reason to have done that and a few of them I just don't get, trimming the mane off in the middle but not front or back. Some of the alleged jutting spines seem to be paired with bulky hips and shoulders. Picture number 4 has a very peculiar physical impossibility in it, as if some ribs somehow got totally misplaced. I don't know if the artist who altered the picture has seen a horse before. Look carefully at the one in the very front in a magnified picture and you can see things that are impossible. The one furthest back has ribs in the wrong place also, an alleged showing rib that makes a curved line right to the middle of the spine. That had to be drawn on. The darkest horse in that same picture has shading added to make the spine look like it is protruding and at the same time it has a massive butt. Gedonkey-donk hips do not go with a spine that is protruding because of starvation. The blurring is a bit variable, masking some alterations, and some of the blurring seems to erase compression artifacts, which also indicates fakery. Like I said, the pictures are not for sale because they want to harass anyone who analyzes them and they particularly do not want someone to mark a picture with lines and arrows and circles to show the alterations and what those pictures looked like before they were processed. Such pictures should not be considered evidence unless they can be proven to be unaltered. The complaining witnesses, the persecution, and the court should bear the cost of proving that their photographs are real, not the defendant. ---Meeting the animal rights activist halfway is trading something that you already own for something else that you already own. They're entitled to nothing and should be given even less. My blog: www.animalculture. Tom K |
__._,_.___
Mandatory spay and neuter means pets must grow old and die without replacements. No more babies, no more pets in our homes. Stop it before it's nationwide. Sterile animals cannot replenish themselves. It's the "facts" of life.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
.
__,_._,___
posted by Capri at
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home