fish vs farmer
----- Original Message -----
From: Wakanska
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: dog_anti-rescue_anti-peta_new fish vs farmer
| I think that they have.. You just weren't paying attention. You've got to look closely and start asking questions. Living in this society is like eating in a dark restaurant. Everything looks good, seems nice and pretty, but if you turned on the lights and got a look at what was going on in the kitchen, it might be a whole different picture. People hide their dirty deeds and their selfish agendas.. that's everyone, whether bad dog breeders, criminal animal rights activists, bad cops and prosecutors, politicians. No one is lilly white, but the worst ones of all are masters of disguise and camoflage...They always make it seem like they are the good guys, and part of the way they do this is by painting everyone else with a bad brush. The more people are looking at the scapegoats and fall guys, the less heat and attention on the phoney-baloneys. This is a common situation with politicians. They take advantage of public opinion, even if it is faulty, to get what they want. For example, when they wanted Indian land to steal, they made even the peaceful, "civilized" tribes out to be a menace. This is what happened to the Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek and Chickasaw people before the great removal, the "Trail of Tears". Those people bent over backwards, even adopting all the white man's ways, trying to remain on good terms and in their own homelands. They even helped Andrew Jackson to win important battles in the War of 1812, which gave him the presidency.. Then he rewarded them by signing the declaration to remove them all to the new territories in Oklahoma (one of the most shameful and tragic events in US history). I see the same thing happened to the Jews.. Hitler wanted their accumulated wealth, and land, and he needed prisoner labor to accomplish his goals. The fact that Germany and Europe in general had a long history of anti-semitism merely made his job easier. It's always the same.. Someone wants something, and they can only get it by stealing, so they have to violate the owners, but first begins the preparatory phase of maligning that section of society you want to violate, so that the rest of society will accept and even participate in the rape. This is the real nature of politics.. the manipulation and exploitation of cultural groups within society, usually by means of propaganda, and eventually, force, under the color of authority. It's a surgical procedure, in a way, and the tools are public opinion, then declarations or law, and finally, law enforcement. Thomas.. If you believed all this time that the Democrat leaders were all really nice guys, you are only typical. Most nice people are naive enough to believe that most other people are nice, honest folk. We take people at face value, and if they say that they want to do something good, we believe them. In a way, we are also guilty of the harm that they bring, because we must accept our part in the role play that they need to succeed in their dirty deeds. It's actually a dependant / co-dependant relationship. It only works for the dependants (criminals who need us to fall for their ruses), because we are trusting and naive. What does the Bible say? "Be ye subtle as serpents, but gentle as doves".. which basically translates into: "Be a nice guy, and harmless to others, but don't be a schmuck by falling for deceptions of malevolent people". It's up to us to see through the wool the tricksters are pulling over our eyes. Historically, the Republican and Democrats split into two parties in the US, when the Whig party disappeared. If I am not mistaken, Andrew Jackson was the first Democrat president. At that time, the Democrat party represented landowners and growers, in the south. They were also slave owners, and ever expanding into new territories, because as growers, they required two things: land, and slaves. As they expanded into the new territories, looking for more land to put under the plow, they brought their slaves along with them, a practice which the northern states disapproved (they saw it as an expansion of slavery, which theyonly tolerated as something very limited in scope). Of course, this contention eventually led to the Civil War, and the one on the side of the slave abolishionists was President Abraham Lincoln, who was a Republican. The other interesting Republican president to me was Teddy Roosevelt.. Interesting, because both he and President Lincoln basically prepared the country for the abolishing of slavery, and the formation of a National Park System, to protect our natural heritage. Yet, curiously, these same platforms have been hijacked by the Democrats, as if they were always behind ecology protections and civil rights, when in fact they were working against them!!!! If you happen to be a born and bred Democrat, you probably hail from one of the parts of the country where early labor movement efforts were focused.. in the western US, this is mainly in mining areas. But I find that Democrats tend to be blindly loyal. You cannot talk to them. A recent acquaintance of mine put it very well. He said that most of the "liberals" (Democrats) tend to focus on very small areas of interest, without seeing the whole picture, and lack in critical thinking skills. I think that's the way it is. For example, an animal rights activist might see the "cruelties" of domestic life and captivity for animals, while ignoring the fact that these animals would not even have a chance at life, if not for their captive role, or that animals in the wild state often suffer horribly, in ways never seen in captivity. I think that if everyone took the matter of their own life seriously, and bothered themselves to go on real fact-finding missions (gathering as much information "pro" as "con", and without bias, and then engaged in some intra-personal debates of their own (critical thinking), that everyone would tend to come to the right decision. Unfortunately, it's not that easy. Most people draw their information and opinions heavily from others, apparently in an interest to fit into the culture they gravitate to. You cannot talk to anyone in the entertainment industry about your own personal insights, if they do not agree. This is a sure career killer. But, who controls the entertainment industry, and the educational empire in the US? The Democrats. They can kill your career and ambitions in a hurry. You dare not disagree with them, or they will show you how very disagreeable they can be.. and absolutely unforgiving. Which is what I find so disturbing about their culture... It tells people that they are free to act up and speak out, but apparently only in a way that is useful to them. If it is not useful to them, they couldn't care less! Dorothy, go and peek behind the curtain and you will learn who the Great Oz really is!!--- On Fri, 9/25/09, Thomas Kirby <slowswimmer1@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
__._,_.___
Mandatory spay and neuter means pets must grow old and die without replacements. No more babies, no more pets in our homes. Stop it before it's nationwide. Sterile animals cannot replenish themselves. It's the "facts" of life.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
.
__,_._,___
Posted via email from capri
posted by Capri at
Friday, September 25, 2009
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home